Announcements-Emails


ACTION ALERT - 2017/18 Fiscal Budget, CEDAC recommendations for Community Plans

posted Jun 18, 2017, 8:21 AM by Lori Parlin   [ updated Jun 18, 2017, 8:21 AM ]

Dear Shingle Springs residents and rural lifestyle supporters,

On Tuesday, June 20, at 2:00 pm, the Board of Supervisors will review and make decisions on the proposed 2017/18 budget.

The Community and Economic Development Advisory Committee (CEDAC) submitted a letter to the Supervisors requesting both fiscal and staff support to implement Community Plans.  That letter is available here:  https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6SYfsvp_87XbkF0LWJJdVVBQ0U/view?usp=sharing

Shingle Springs residents and businesses worked toward creating a Community Plan in 2013/14 and are ready to complete that process with the County's support.  As such, the Shingle Springs Community Alliance sent a letter to support CEDAC's request.  That letter is below for your reference.

Feel free to send in your own letter of support or attend the meeting, if you are available.  

The agenda item and attachments for the budget are available here:  http://eldorado.legistar.com/gateway.aspx?m=l&id=/matter.aspx?key=22345

Thank you!

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 2017/18 Fiscal Budget, CEDAC recommendations for Community
Plans
From: "Lori at Shingle Springs Community Alliance"
<info@shinglespringscommunityalliance.com>
Date: Fri, June 16, 2017 12:14 pm
To: john.hidahl@edcgov.us, "Shiva Frentzen" <shiva.frentzen@edcgov.us>,
brian.veerkamp@edcgov.us, Michael.ranalli@edcgov.us,
sue.novasel@edcgov.us
Cc: "Clerk of the Board" <edc.cob@edcgov.us>, don.ashton@edcgov.us,
shawne.corley@edcgov.us, "Creighton Avila" <creighton.avila@edcgov.us>,
tiffany.schmid@edcgov.us, "Anne Novotny" <anne.novotny@edcgov.us>,
cynthia.freeland@edcgov.us

Dear Supervisors,

The Shingle Springs Community Alliance core group supports CEDAC's request for fiscal and staff support for the development of Community Plans.  Shingle Springs residents made great strides in 2013 and 2014 toward implementing a Community Plan, and are ready to complete that process with the County's guidance and support, as is suggested in the Community Plan Guide dated November 2014.

Based on discussions with former Long Range Planning Director Dave Defanti and former Principal Planner Shawna Purvines, the Shingle Springs Community Plan will focus on creating design standards for multi-family and commercial development within the commercial core along Mother Lode Drive.  This is an excellent opportunity to pursue economic development in that area by creating a unifying theme for new development centered around the train depot.

We ask that you adopt CEDAC's recommendations as part of the 2017/18 budget.  

As stated at the September 11, 2013 meeting in Shingle Springs,

"The Shingle Springs Community Identity and Community Plan Will:
Respect the rural lifestyle of the current residents while allowing for economic expansion that builds upon the rural character and contributes to the economic health of Shingle Springs.

The Shingle Springs community envisions itself as a peaceful country community with ranches and homes on acreage."

Thank you,


Lori Parlin on behalf of the
Shingle Springs Community Alliance
  Keeping Shingle Springs Rural

ENVIRONMENTAL LAWSUIT OVER TRIBAL GAS STATION SETTLED

posted May 25, 2017, 8:00 AM by Lori Parlin

FYI - Forwarded from El Dorado Council.

ENVIRONMENTAL LAWSUIT OVER
TRIBAL GAS STATION SETTLED

May 24, 2017, Shingle Springs, CA

    On May 23, 2017, El Dorado Council, Inc., filed a Settlement with the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians Tribe regarding the environmental review of the Express Fuels gas station project on Shingle Springs Drive. The environmental review for the gas station project is different than other projects in the county because the gas station is on tribal trust land of which the county has no land use authority other than the driveway encroachments, and water/sewer easements. Additionally, the environmental review was piecemealed when El Dorado County approved the project by only analyzing the traffic impacts from the gas station and not the entire, built-out project on the 34.63-acre site.

    Due to the limited scope of the environmental review, the Tribe and El Dorado Council worked diligently within the Settlement to create mitigations that would reduce the impacts of the gas station project, and more. Two of the more significant settlement points were the gun range and the potential for an unfair business advantage. The gun range has been a contentious issue between the neighbors and the Tribe since it opened in 2015. As part of the settlement, the Tribe agrees to study and perform feasible mitigations to bring the gun range within the bounds of the County's noise ordinance. Mitigations could include enclosing the gun range to create an indoor range or installing a sound wall around the outdoor gun range. Bringing the gun range into compliance with the County's noise ordinance is a first step in building a better relationship between the Tribe and its neighbors.

    To address the concerns about unfair business competition, the Tribe has agreed to charge non-Indian customers approximately the same taxes as other businesses in the County. This arrangement will prevent the Tribe from using their tax structure to unfairly compete with local businesses and is aligned with the 2006 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that the Tribe has with the County of El Dorado.

    Other settlement points include public safety measures, monitoring the underground storage tanks, inspecting the storm water drainage system, collaborating on the landscape plan to reduce noise and lighting from the project, consideration of a green-energy solar farm, and a full Environmental Impact Report if and when the Tribe moves forward on developing the remainder of the 34.63-acre parcel. It is the intent of the Settlement Agreement to move forward and for the residents, businesses, and Tribe to work collaboratively with respect to land use and other environmental issues of mutual interest.

    Questions or Comments may be sent to eldocouncil@gmail.com

Supervisor Frentzen Town Hall Meeting 5/25/17 6:30 - 8:00 pm

posted May 21, 2017, 8:25 PM by Lori Parlin   [ updated May 21, 2017, 8:25 PM ]

Dear Shingle Springs residents and rural lifestyle supporters,

Supervisor Shiva Frentzen represents El Dorado County District 2, which includes parts of Shingle Springs.   As such, Shingle Springs residents are encouraged to attend this meeting to hear Supervisor Frentzen's update about the County and to ask questions.

Here is the information from the County's Press Release:

WHAT: El Dorado County Supervisor Shiva Frentzen Town Hall Meeting

WHEN: Thursday, May 25th, 2017 6:30 pm – 8:00 pm

WHERE: Cameron Park Community Services District 2502 Country Club Drive Cameron Park

District 2 Supervisor Shiva Frentzen announced she will hold a Town Hall meeting in Cameron Park to provide an update on County issues and a proposed expansion of El Dorado Transit services. The meeting will be held Thursday, May 25th from 6:30 pm-8:00 pm at the Cameron Park Community Services District.

“Town Hall meetings are a valuable way to communicate to the residents in my district about the important matters occurring in the places they live, work and play,” said Frentzen. “I know Board of Supervisor meetings aren’t convenient, or even possible, for everyone to attend, so it’s important that I take the information on the road and hear from community members outside Board Chambers.”

In addition to the proposed expansion of transit services, Supervisor Frentzen will provide an update on the County’s 2017-18 budget and road maintenance.    

Banning Ranch decision favorable to citizens

posted May 14, 2017, 10:20 PM by Lori Parlin   [ updated May 14, 2017, 10:20 PM ]

Dear Shingle Springs residents and rural lifestyle supporters,

Rural Communities United (RCU) is the grassroots group in El Dorado County that is working to restore the voter-approved General Plan. RCU filed a lawsuit against El Dorado County when the Board of Supervisors voted 4-1 to alter the General Plan in such a way as to increase development beyond the voter-approved plan.

The email post below from RCU explains the significance of the recent Banning Ranch Conservancy (BRC) ruling by the California Supreme Court. The ruling emphasizes the responsibility of elected officials to conduct proper environmental review.

The BRC ruling reinforces the validity of the issues we have with our own county and sets a precedent to improve the environmental review process for projects like San Stino's Mill Creek development.

Please forward this information to neighbors, friends, and family.

Thank you!

********* Forwarded message from RCU:

CA Supreme Court Decision Favorable to Citizens and Environmental Law
On March 20, 2017, the Banning Ranch Conservancy (BRC) announced a win for citizens throughout California who are fighting to get their elected officials to abide by environmental law. The Supreme Court of California published its ruling in the BRC case, making it clear that the environmental review process is more than just a checkbox to mark to approve a project.

Rural Communities United (RCU) attorney Tom Infusino shared the outcome of this case and its importance with the El Dorado County Planning Commissioners and Board of Supervisors, in a letter dated April 26, 2017. As the decision makers for development in El Dorado County, Commissioners and Supervisors need to understand the impact of this recent court ruling. The court ruling dictates that decision makers have a duty to determine if meaningful environmental review of projects has actually occurred, prior to making any land use decision. It is not ‘ok’ to disregard public comments that question development impacts: full disclosure and fully reasoned analysis must be in evidence, or their decisions will be overturned.

“The preparation and circulation of an EIR [Environmental Impact Report] is more than a set of technical hurdles for agencies and developers to overcome. The EIR’s function is to ensure that government officials who decide to build or approve a project do so with a full understanding of the environmental consequences and, equally important, that the public is assured those consequences have been taken into account.”

Read the full post with links to documents here:

Results of Dixon Ranch and CP Sign Ordinance

posted Feb 15, 2017, 10:47 PM by Lori Parlin

Dear Shingle Springs residents and rural lifestyle supporters,

This was a busy week and we have two updates for you:

1.  Cameron Park Sign Standards - The meeting on 2/13/17 went well and the Cameron Park Design Review Committee (CPDRC) received good feedback on their draft.  Let's stay engaged and supportive of their efforts to better understand the process and decide which parts of their Sign Ordinance we would like to adopt for Shingle Springs.  Thank you to the CPDRC for keeping us in the loop on this project.

2.  Dixon Ranch project - On 2/14/17, after a good discussion and meaningful public comments, District 1 Supervisor Hidahl, District 2 Supervisor Frentzen, and District 4 Supervisor Ranalli voted to have staff draft Findings to deny the project  (District 3 Supervisor Veerkamp and District 5 Supervisor Novasel voted to approve the project).  When the Findings to support denial are drafted, County Counsel will put them on the Consent Calendar for the Board to approve.  Once the Findings are approved, the project is officially denied.  Keep in mind that the developer may submit a revised version of the project or simply drop it all together. 

To view the video of the Dixon Ranch project at the Board of Supervisors, go to this link and click on Item #26 at the 4:02:24 time mark:  http://eldorado.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=924

This shows that by staying engaged in the process and holding our elected officials accountable for their actions, that we can get our voices heard to protect our quality of life.  Supervisor Frentzen's statement said it well:  Let's use our limited resources for economic development, not general plan amendments.

Thank you to everyone who was able to make it to the meetings or sent in emails.  By working together and supporting each other, we are making a difference!

ACTION ALERT! Please attend Dixon Ranch at BOS 2-14-17 at 2:00 pm

posted Feb 9, 2017, 8:28 PM by Lori Parlin   [ updated Feb 9, 2017, 8:29 PM ]

Dear Shingle Springs residents and rural lifestyle supporters,

Please see the Green Valley Alliance email below and take action to request that the Supervisors deny the Dixon Ranch development project.  The Dixon Ranch project parallels the San Stino's Mill Creek project in many ways (same developer, pre-existing low-density land use designation, community region boundary, formerly agricultural land, and more).  We must take action so that the Dixon Ranch project does not set a precedent for other high-density projects in low-density neighborhoods, such as San Stino's Mill Creek.  Thank you for your perseverance to keep El Dorado County rural.

    ~  Lori Parlin, Shingle Springs Community Alliance


Measure E was voted into place by the voters of El Dorado County despite the false and misleading opposition to it by special interest groups sponsored by developers. The measure was passed to prevent developments such as Dixon Ranch from being wrongfully approved when the circumstances merit denial. Why is it important to defend against Dixon Ranch?  It is in many ways similar to San Stino's Mill Creek with regard to density, impact to traffic, light pollution, and the quality of life to its nearby residents.  It's important to note that approval requires a General Plan amendment and rezone, much like Mill Creek would.  Our county Supervisors need to uphold the will of the people and apply Measure E when considering this development.  Dixon Ranch should be a NO vote as dictated by Measure E. If Dixon Ranch is approved, it may very well set the stage for what's to come in Shingle Springs.

    ~  Frank Verdin, No San Stino




Please attend – Dixon Ranch at BOS on 2-14-17 at 2:00 pm

Dear Green Valley corridor residents and supporters:
Please attend this critical meeting of the Board for the final vote on Dixon Ranch. Help show Supervisors that the proposed density increase on this site is unacceptable. If this project & its 605 homes is news to you, visit the GVA page, https://sites.google.com/site/greenvalleyroadalliance/dixon-ranch, then:
  • Call the Supervisors to express your concerns: If you or friends in Dist 4 voted for Supervisor Ranalli, please remind him of his campaign promise, memorialized in the 9/18/14 Shingle Springs Community Alliance questionnaire and reiterated on his campaign website:
ranalli-questionnaire
Call him and ask if you can count on him Feb 14th to retain the designated land use of the Dixon Ranch site as Low Density Residential.
Contact info for Board of Supervisors:
1. John Hidahl, Supervisor District I, (530) 621-5650, bosone@edcgov.us
2. Shiva Frentzen, Supervisor District II, (530) 621-5651, bostwo@edcgov.us
3. Brian Veerkamp, Supervisor District III, (530) 621-5652, bosthree@edcgov.us
4. Michael Ranalli, Supervisor District IV, (530) 621-6513, bosfour@edcgov.us
5. Sue Novasel, Supervisor District V, (530) 621-6577, bosfive@edcgov.us
Clerk of the Board: edc.cob@edcgov.us

  •  Visit the new Facebook page 'Stop Dixon Ranch' (https://www.facebook.com/stopdixonranch/), to share information and connect with others who oppose the project. Please use your social media skills to help spread the word.
February 14th - yep, Valentine's Day- if approved, this project will set a precedent for other proposals attempting to upzone lower density land and ignore voter approved Measure E. Don't let this happen. We don't say this often, but if you are able, take the afternoon off and be there to hold our electeds accountable. Mark your calendars now: 2pm Tues Feb 14th, 2850 Fairlane Ct Bldg C, Placerville
Ellen Van Dyke for Green Valley Alliance
www.GreenValleyAlliance.org

dixon-ranch-map

You're Invited - Sign Standards meeting 2-13-17

posted Feb 5, 2017, 10:32 PM by Lori Parlin   [ updated Feb 5, 2017, 10:32 PM ]

Dear Shingle Springs residents and rural lifestyle supporters,

The Cameron Park Design Review Committee (CPDRC), has been working on a draft of the Cameron Park Sign Standards.  The committee recently issued a Press Release inviting the public to receive a presentation on the draft on Monday, February 13, 2017 at 6:30 pm at the Cameron Park Community Center located at 2502 Country Club Drive.   


We encourage you to attend the meeting to support their community efforts and to see how the Cameron Park Sign Standards will differ from the County Sign Standards.  As we renew our endeavor for a Shingle Springs Community Plan, we may want to incorporate some or all of the Cameron Park Sign Standards into our own Plan.

If you would like an advance PDF copy of the Cameron Park Sign Standards prior to the meeting, please email Committee Chair, Vince Maloney, at vkmaloney@gmail.com.  

SAN STINO'S MILL CREEK UPDATE:  We haven't sent out any email updates yet this year, so we thought we should take this opportunity to let you know that, according to County Planner Rob Peters, the San Stino's Mill Creek project is currently on hold.  That means it could start moving forward again at any time.

SAVE THE DATE:  The Dixon Ranch project is scheduled for a Board of Supervisors hearing on February 14, 2017 at 2:00 pm.  Please attend!  This project parallels the San Stino's Mill Creek project, so we want to ensure that the County follows environmental law and Measure E.  A separate email will follow soon.

Please stay engaged and connected to our community.  The developers hope that we will become complacent and not be ready for action when their projects move forward.  Shingle Springs is a wonderful place to live and we must be prepared to protect our quality of life.

Thank you!

Opportunity knocks - Help keep Shingle Springs rural

posted Nov 20, 2016, 8:58 AM by Lori Parlin   [ updated Nov 20, 2016, 9:29 AM ]

Greetings Shingle Springs residents and rural lifestyle supporters

The future of El Dorado County will be decided in the courts.  Please help if you can and share this information with others:

PCLF is the Planning & Conservation League Foundation.  Donations are tax deductible through Planning & Conservation League (PCL) Foundation’s fiscal sponsorship under their 501(c)(3).

Thank you!


Action Alert! Community Region Boundaries on 10-25-16 BOS agenda

posted Oct 22, 2016, 11:51 PM by Lori Parlin   [ updated Oct 22, 2016, 11:52 PM ]

Dear Shingle Springs residents and rural lifestyle supporters,

Please contact the Board of Supervisors and tell them that you expect them to follow through on their promise to consider reducing the Shingle Springs Community Region Boundary (CRB) during the 2011-2015 Five Year Review of the General Plan.

On the upcoming 10-25-16 Board of Supervisors agenda, the Long Range Planning staff is recommending that the Supervisors receive and file the Five Year Review and find that there is no need to change the CRBs.  A CRB is where the county plans to put the highest and most intense development in the County.  Shingle Springs identifies itself as "a peaceful country community with ranches and homes on acreage," and the CRB conflicts with our community identity and sense of place.  

Shingle Springs residents have attended meetings for years with the goal to have our CRBs reduced.  A timeline of those meetings is included in the  Five Year Review and excerpted below for your convenience.  Please take action to tell the Supervisors that we do not want all of our efforts ignored again.

If you are able to attend the meeting:

Tuesday, October 25, 2016 at 1:00 pm
Building C Hearing Room  (Temporary location during construction)
2850 Fairlane Court
Placerville, CA

IF YOU CANNOT ATTEND - Write to the Supervisors - Customize our sample email to fit your concerns


Subject:  10-25-16 BOS Agenda, File #16--0477, Item #38

Dear Supervisors,

I request that you reject staff's recommendation to receive and file the Five Year Review.  Based on the discussions at past meetings, the expectation was that you would initiate the reduction of the CRBs during the Five Year Review process. Please follow through and direct staff to begin the process to reduce the CRBs as part of the 2016-2020 work plan. 

Sincerely,

[Your Name]
[Your Town]


**************************************************************************************************************************************************
Excerpt from page 25 of the Five Year Review - timeline of events regarding Community Region Boundaries:

On October 1, 2012, the Board directed additional analysis of possibly adding, amending or deleting existing Community Regions, or Rural Center planning areas be removed from the TGPA-ZOU project description; and to consider as a potential Project Alternative in the EIR, with the exception of the proposed amendment to Policies 2.1.1.1 and 2.1.2.1. These policies relate to the current Community Region of Camino/Pollock Pines proposed for amending into the three Rural Centers of Camino, Cedar Grove, and Pollock Pines.

Potential revisions to Community Region boundary lines were discussed during Board meetings and workshops on May 7, May 14, June 27, and September 30, 2013. On June 11, 2013, staff provided the Board with a “White Paper” on General Plan Amendments related to Community Region Boundary Lines, and set June 27, 2013 as a Special Meeting of the Board to discuss the White Paper. The White Paper included a General Plan history, review of the current development process, and options for the Board to consider, should they choose to go forward with a General Plan Amendment to modify the Community Region boundaries (see June 11, 2013 Board of Supervisors Agenda, Item No. 2, Legistar File No. 13-0510, Attachment 2A). On June 27, 2013, the Board directed staff to return in approximately 60 days with a work plan pertaining to costs and next steps on Community Region boundary lines. On September 30, 2013, the Board directed staff to return to the Board in early 2014 with 16-0477 2B 26 of 111 El Dorado County General Plan 2011-2015 Five Year Review October 2016 26 examples and/or options for considering amending the Shingle Springs and El Dorado Hills Community Region Boundary lines.

On December 9, 2014, potential options related to the potential amendment of Community Region boundary lines for the communities of Shingle Springs and El Dorado Hills were presented to the Board. At this meeting, the Board received requests from members of the public to amend specific boundaries in the areas north of El Dorado Hills along Green Valley Road, southeast area of Shingle Springs, and in the Camino/Pollock Pines area. The Board directed staff to prepare a Resolution of Intention to contract the Community Region boundary lines for Shingle Springs and El Dorado Hills along the Green Valley Corridor, using maps provided by a Shingle Springs resident and an El Dorado Hills resident.

On February 24, 2015, staff presented proposed General Plan amendments to contract the Community Region boundary lines for El Dorado Hills, Shingle Springs, Cameron Park and El Dorado-Diamond Springs. Staff also asked the Board for the preferred method for processing this project based on staff and funding availability. The Board directed the Community Region boundary options to be addressed as a component of the next General Plan five-year review, including review of the proposed maps and any other map considerations of Community Region boundary line alterations, in relation to the goals and objectives of the General Plan. 

We support John Hidahl for District 1 Supervisor

posted Sep 14, 2016, 7:20 AM by Lori Parlin   [ updated Sep 14, 2016, 7:21 AM ]

Dear Shingle Springs residents and rural lifestyle supporters,

The Shingle Springs Community Alliance Core Committee endorses John Hidahl in his bid for District 1 County Supervisor.  John supports and aligns with community groups all over El Dorado County.  He understands the importance of making sure that existing residents are not negatively impacted by new development.  As such, John has consistently stood with residents against projects like the Central El Dorado Hills Golf Course rezone, San Stino's Mill Creek, and Marble Valley because they are beyond what was promised in the General Plan. 

Please help John become Supervisor by reaching out to your friends and family in El Dorado Hills and ask them to vote for John Hidahl for District 1 Supervisor.  We look forward to him taking a seat on the Board to represent the people of the County and not the developer interests.

John's opponent has not lived in El Dorado County for years and purchased an El Dorado Hills house in 2015 just to qualify to run for Supervisor.  She also recently registered to vote in El Dorado County in February 2016 and has already started her campaign to run for the Senate in 2020, which would interfere with local Supervisorial duties.  She has not been involved in local issues and is simply using El Dorado County to keep her name in the limelight to further her political career.  We do not need a Supervisor who is unfamiliar with the unique needs of El Dorado County and is planning a short stint of representation as Supervisor.



Please visit John Hidahl's website at http://hidahl4supe.com to find out how you can help support him in his bid for election on November 8, 2016.   Forward this email to your contacts in District 1, and consider donating to John's campaign to help him overcome Beth Gaines' well-funded run for Supervisor. 

Investing in John's candidacy is an investment in our future.

1-10 of 172